Chryslers future
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:09 amJust read this.....http://autos.aol.com/article/chrysler-b ... lan-2009... Sad to see the Viper go 
but glad to see them save the Challenger. 
but glad to see them save the Challenger. Page 1 of 2
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:09 amRe: Chryslers future
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:09 pmI read that the Viper production would only stop for 1 year then start up again. But who knows?
Re: Chryslers future
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:48 pmActually Viper production started right back up after the little down time this year. "Little known serect I got from the horse's month ". This is the car that needs to be saved.
Re: Chryslers future
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:36 pmI agree, but a lot of people here want a new K car, 
I will take a Viper any time over all the K cars in the world 
I will take a Viper any time over all the K cars in the world Re: Chryslers future
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 5:38 pmHeck....I would throw in my K-car and my better half for a Viper or a Challenger....
Re: Chryslers future
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 6:46 pmi agree they need a new car like the K-car, ford has the right idea with the focus, offering 2 door coupes 5 speed manual transmission, super base models with no A/C
Re: Chryslers future
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 8:23 pm88 aries wrote:i agree they need a new car like the K-car, ford has the right idea with the focus, offering 2 door coupes 5 speed manual transmission, super base models with no A/C
So you want them to make a car like the Hyundai Accent "Blue",
The new Hyundai Accent 'Blue' is a stripped model three-door hatchback with manual windows and locks, no radio, no standard A/C (though it is an option... the only option), and an efficient 4-cylinder engine coupled to a manual trans. The prices start around $9,600.
Re: Chryslers future
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:46 pmthats the way chrysler needs ot think again, i will laugh when the fiat comes here LOL
Re: Chryslers future
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 1:05 amI would have a K-car and a Viper. I am different. All cars should be appreciated.
Re: Chryslers future
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:47 pmViper is too much car for me. (My brother had one).
Saw a brand new 2010 Challenger on the 5 south on the way to San Diego a few months back. The piece of junk rear bumper was flapping in the wind at 70-75mph. No damage, brand new it is so flimsy that a breeze moves it. You can have that new car garbage. That is not a real Challenger, it is a plastic toy wannabe IMO. Classic or nothing for me.
That is what they should be crushing: the cheap plastic new cars. Absolute garbage. (Recycle them into cup holders). Used to travel all over the US for work and have rented too many cars to count. Few impressed me. Concede that the newer Mustangs are a real blast to drive and handle real well.
We rented a 2 year old Taurus recently. Closed the driver side door and was hit by the door panel falling off. The guy at the rental place knew of the problem and snapped it back on. Always seeing new cars with parts missing around town and also on the side of the road. All neighbors have more car problems than we do. Ill keep driving appreciating metal classics and let everyone else drive depreciating plastic imitations. What makes more sense: to PAY to drive a car? Or to drive for free (and possibly profit a few dollars now and then)?