by RichG » Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:09 pm
You have to understand that these cars were not built with the intention of lasting 12 years, let alone 20. The object was to turn out a car that would be traded or privately sold in six years, leading to another purchase....long before leasing was an option. Now, manufacturers are building vehicles with the leasing option in mind, for longevity and brand loyalty. Honda and Toyota started engineering engines designed to last 160,000 miles in the late 80's. Detriot is only catching up within the last six years; their heavy reliance on SUV's and truck based platforms meant they learned nothing fromthe late 70's gas crisis. The Japanese developed the engines first, then went to work on the unibody concept with greater attention to body panel and structural longevity. U.S. manufacturers were preoccupied with cost cutting measures, (which is reflected in the interior trim of most 80-85 vehicles), and using engine concepts that were designed based on older engineering models. My point, (and I do have one), is simply that nobody cares about the early 80 sedans because they were middle class grocery getters....mom and pop vehicles that were mostly family oriented.....not exciting (competent, perhaps) and that lacked pizzaz. And that is evident because of the remarkable amount that have LOW mileage on them. Most of what the club has in rolling stock was grandmas car, or Aunt Mary's, or an elderly persons legacy. If they were driven average annual mileage, say, 15,000 per year, the average 1983 vehicle should have 400,000 miles on it, and thats simply not the case with K cars (or most any car, for that matter.) Our cars were not on the road all that much, and they have survived because of it.
1984 Le Baron Convertible 2.2
2002 Ford Taurus
2004 Mazda 3 5-speed