by capev86 » Thu Nov 27, 2008 4:13 am
the balance shafts do make these engines smoother than they would be otherwise. you won't find them in a dakota 2.5 because of the engine placement the deeper oil pan wouldn't fit. removing them you need to tap and plug the hole otherwise you will have no oil pressure. it is said that you lose about 12 hp at max (6k) rpm from parasitic losses, but that equates to about 3hp at 3k rpm which is where sensible drivers stay. i prefer the finesse of the having the shafts intact. the deeper oil pan is more likely to hit rocks and stuff if you go off road. pulling the shafts - you either run more oil (i think 2 quarts) or you put a non balance shaft pan on from a 2.2, etc. only 2.2's to get the shafts were the TIII dual cam engines from the spirit, daytona and phantom rt's and possibly the variable nozzle turbo IV cars of 1989/90 but i'm not sure on the latter.
as for the 2.5 not liking passing gear......i don't know about that. in tbi form, the 2.5 will spank a 2.2. i'd rather have the torque to accelerate and cruise on the highway than have a rev happy engine that the auto trans fails to make use of. the 2.2 is a good engine, but if i want rev's i'll just buy a nice honda.
to answer a lot of questions check out thedodgegarage.com and search his archive of information. the 86-88 tall deck 2.5 had a block off plate for a (carb appications) fuel pump. when the common block 2.2 and 2.5 came out in 89 there was no hole because all applications were tbi or mpi. and the RT twin cam (common) blocks had no distributor hole because they used distributor-less ignition like modern cars.